Tag Archives: Lies

Eight Propaganda Myths about the Conflict in the Ukraine

  1. Putin is a new Hitler and he must not be appeased.

However much Putin is worthy of being liked or being hated, one thing is certain: the facts state that his policies are quite different from Hitler’s and from the appeasement by Western leaders regarding his invasion of the then Czechoslovakia. The ‘Putler’ myth was invented and repeated by politicians and journalists who know nothing either of the facts of Czechoslovak history or of the Ukraine.

Czechoslovakia was not formed out of Germany, it was formed out of Austria-Hungary after 1917. Czechoslovakia had a small German-speaking minority, which lived on excellent terms with the Czechs. However, the Ukraine was formed out of Russia after 1917 and had a Russian-speaking majority, about 53%, whose language, religion and culture were severely persecuted by the anti-democratically Western-installed Kiev Fascist regime. Hitler’s forces mounted a full-scale, unprovoked invasion of Czechoslovakia to take over the whole Czech part of the country, whereas limited Russian forces, numbering only about 100,000, entered Eastern Ukraine to liberate it alone from Kiev genocide (14,000 Eastern Ukrainians murdered since 2014), with NATO-trained Kiev forces of some 800,000 massing on its border to implement ‘the final solution’ and Kiev threats of biological and nuclear warfare against Russia. Russian forces gathered only in order to force peace talks. To mount a full-scale invasion of the Ukraine would take 1-2 million troops.

Hitler wanted ‘Lebensraum’, Putin, as the leader of by far the largest country in the world, does not want that at all, he wants people to live in freedom from Fascism and have their own language, culture and religion. Hitler hated the ‘subhuman’ Czechs, Putin loves the Ukrainian people, which is why hardly any Ukrainian civilians have died in this conflict. He sees Ukrainians as the persecuted brothers of Russians who live by the border (‘U kraja’). The ideology of Hitler was anti-Slav Nazism, just like the Fascist and racist ideology of the Western-created Kiev regime, whereas the ideology of Putin is Russian nationalism. For eight long years Putin tried to negotiate peace with Kiev’s Western puppeteers, but they lied, cheated and refused even to speak with him. This was not the case of Hitler, who did not want to negotiate at all – just like the Fascist regime in Kiev. Virtually the whole world abhorred Hitler, virtually the whole world either supports Russia or else remains neutral in the Russian fight for survival against Western aggression. It is the Nazi-supporting Western world which is isolated, not Russia. NATO, which controlled the Kiev armed forces, was founded by Nazi Germans, whereas the Russian Army evolved from the Nazi-hating Red Army.

  1. Russia is an existential threat to Western Europe

The NATO-armed, -financed, -supplied, -trained and -installed Kiev regime was an existential threat to Russia. It had by far the largest NATO Army, a mass of CIA operations and military biolabs, the ongoing genocide of the Russian-speaking population in the east of the Ukraine and the threat to obtain nuclear arms. All of this went against the Ukrainian Constitution, which was founded on neutrality. As the unelected EU ‘Foreign Minister’ Kallas has openly said, the aim of the Western proxy war in the Ukraine is to destroy and break up Russia, and as a NATO general said, he wants to invade Russian Kaliningrad in one day.

However, Russia is not at all an existential threat to Europe. It wants only a neutral Ukraine and does not want even to occupy the Ukraine, let alone any territory beyond that. It wants to take back the Russian part of the Ukraine and let the rest live its life but as a neutral, demilitarised country, rather as was the Kaiser’s aim in France in 1914.

Russia is not an existential threat to Europe, but it is to the wealthy European ruling class, which flies Ukrainian flags, with its millennial imperialism (‘globalism’) and racist supremacism, aggressive expansionism eastwards, financial corruption, the debauchery of its sexual perverts and cocaine addicts, and pedophile institutions like the BBC and parts of Western religious establishments. This unelected elite of oligarchs opposes diplomacy because it wants to continue the war, rejecting all peace talks because it wants to justify its highly profitable NATO. It justifies its existence by imaginary threats from Russia. It cannot lose face, but Trump can, by branding this ‘Biden’s War’, so blaming it on someone else.

  1. Russia has not been successful in the Ukraine because it has not learned the lessons of the past.

Invasions of Russia by the Collective West have been very common for centuries, even well before that of Napoleon in 1812. The threatened invasion of Russian-populated territory in March 2022, carefully prepared from 2014, and even before, had been anticipated by President Putin. He had clearly learned the lessons of mistakes made by Russia before previous Western invasions.

Firstly, he had learned lessons from the Western invasion of Russia through the Crimea in 1853-1856. Here Russia had been undermined economically by Western sanctions and by its use of old-fashioned rifles. As a result, the British destroyed the (British-built) port of Sevastopol and the war ended in a stalemate, portrayed in the West as a victory. Lesson: Use advanced military technology and be prepared for sanctions.

In 1903-4 the West attacked Russia through a proxy, Japan, which the West had armed and financed, almost bankrupting Japan, with modern battleships. Japan attacked Russia unannounced, just as they later did at Pearl Harbour, and the Russian Fleet was humiliated. Although the Russian land war went relatively well and was on the verge of victory, Russia was betrayed by internal political enemies who created social disorder and Russia had to agree to peace talks. Lesson: Build a strong Navy and ensure there is no reason for internal disorder.

In World War One, by the start of 1917, a rearmed Russia was on the verge of victory over Germany and Austro-Hungary, but it was betrayed by the treason of the Germans, the British (and other pseudo-allies), its own treasonous generals, aristocrats, politicians and the lies of treasonous but uncensored journalists, and lost. Lesson: Do not allow treason, be prepared to arrest foreign spies and aristocratic and other traitors, and use censorship.

In 1941, Hitler and all his Western allies attacked the Soviet Union and was at first immensely victorious on account of Stalin’s inept leadership which had left his armed forces totally unprepared. The situation was turned around when Stalin handed over leadership to the military professionals who had been trained in the Tsar’s armed forces. Lesson: Be prepared for a treacherous attack and let military professionals deal with any aggression.

Russia has been successful precisely because it has learned the lessons of the past Western invasions of Russia.

4. Negotiations bring an end to wars.

Wars are not generally ended by negotiations, they end with victory and defeat on the battlefield, like the First and Second World Wars. The negotiations follow defeats.

  1. Russia is losing because it has scarcely taken any territory since 2022.

By far the biggest country in the world, Russia does not want any extra territory. It wants security guarantees. Its aims were clearly stated on 14 February 2022 and have not changed since then and the main aim was to destroy the Ukrainian military by attrition. This means avoid making frontal attacks and waiting to be attacked by the enemy. Defenders suffer less than attackers.

The dreadful conflict in the Ukraine is then a war of attrition. Wars of attrition, like the First and Second World Wars, continue slowly for several years, with little movement, and then end suddenly. Thus, the First World War ended in five months between July and November 1918 after four years of attrition before that, and the Second World War ended in eleven months between Operation Bagration in June 1944 and D-Day and the Soviet liberation of Auschwitz and Berlin in May 1945, after five years of attrition before that. Russia is no hurry in the Ukraine, on the contrary, the longer it takes, the more the West is weakened.

  1. Russia wants to occupy the whole of the Ukraine.

The Ukraine is an artificial state, formed by three tyrannical Communist dictators, Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev, who brutally stole parts of Russia, Poland, Hungary and Romania to form the present, Soviet-bordered, Ukraine. Russia wants to recreate the historic Ukraine, more exactly ‘Kievan Rus’, within its real borders. The models for any future Ukraine are therefore Federal and democratic Switzerland, its neutrality guaranteed in 1820 and never violated since, or, in the second half of the last century, Finland and Austria.

  1. The Ukraine is a viable state.

The Ukraine has been renowned for thirty-five years as the most corrupt of the former Soviet Republics, ruled by the thirteen oligarchs, mainly non-Ukrainian, and a country deprived of human rights. The Ukraine has for long been bankrupt and now has the highest death-rate and lowest birth-rate in the world. Viable?

  1. Russia is a non-democratic, authoritarian regime.

The Russian President has for 25 years always gained between 60% and 85% of the popular vote. The EU Commissioners are unelected and all the Western leaders, who are now trying to impose censorship, were chosen by oligarchs and elected by between only 20% and 35% of their electorates. Perhaps the real leader of the Free World is President Putin?

Next week Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople is having to visit the USA. Almost certainly he will be told to abandon his gangster church in the Ukraine. It is one of the Russian conditions for peace, to have a Church that the people recognise, and not a nationalist State organisation imposed top-down, which the people ignore.

 

Repentance?

‘According to information from the Swiss Federal Institute for NBC-protection in Spiez, whose experts received samples collected in Salisbury by the OPCW specialists and finished testing them on 27 March, the experts of the Institute discovered traces of a toxic chemical called “BZ” and its precursors. It is a Schedule 2 substance under the Chemical Weapons Convention. “BZ” is a chemical agent which is used to temporary incapacitate people. The desired psychotoxic effect is reached in 30-60 minutes after application of the agent and lasts up to four days.

This agent was used in the armed forces of the USA, United Kingdom and several other NATO member states. No stocks of such substance ever existed either in the Soviet Union or in the Russian Federation. In the view of the experts, such a concentration of the A-234 (Novichok) agent would result in an inevitable fatal outcome after its administration. Moreover, considering its high volatility, the detection of this substance in its initial state (pure form and high concentration) is extremely suspicious, as the samples were taken several weeks after the poisoning.

It looks highly likely that the “BZ” nerve agent was used in Salisbury. The fact that Yulia Skripal and Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey have already been discharged from hospital (though have been forbidden from speaking to the media – Editor) and Sergei Skripal is on his way to recovery, only supports such a conclusion’.

Source: https://www.rusemb.org.uk/fnapr/6486

Following the Trump bombast, British Establishment lies, May’s minority government acting illegally and anti-democratically, bombing another sovereign state with weapons of mass destruction, when that state presented no threat at all to the UK, what will happen to the Swiss report? Will there follow an apology? Repentance? Publication by the closely censored British media? Of course not. Liars do not do that. And how do we know? Because the father of lies is Satan and he too is incapable of repenting.

Fake News

First, they called it ‘lies’, then under the Jesuits and later Dr Goebbels they called it ‘propaganda’. Then in the Soviet Union it became ‘disinformation’ and in the West ‘PR’, more recently ‘spin’ and now ‘fake news’. Such are the euphemisms for LIES.

The Western Establishment has excelled itself in this regard, renaming reality to suit itself. For example, Western experts long ago renamed the Age of the Saints ‘The Dark Ages’, labelled the Middle Ages ‘Gothic’, which they were not, repaganization they called ‘The Renaissance’, darkness they called ‘The Enlightenment’, brutal paganism they call ‘modern times’ and the abortion holocaust ‘women’s rights’.

The British Establishment, founded by French-speaking, but still barbarian, Vikings, has shown special skills in this field. Thus it calls native English people ‘Anglo-Saxons’, which they never called themselves, and decreed that they died out in 1066 under themselves, the ‘superior’ Normans, superior because they were more efficient at murder. Then it called a murderous civil war ‘The War of the Roses’, named the looting and wholesale destruction of monastic life and care for the poor under the odious tyrant and mass murderer Henry VIII, ‘The Reformation’, and glorified Cromwell, one of the most violent murderers in human history (1,000,000 dead?), with a statue outside the Establishment’s Parliament.

Later it called a Dutch invasion that cost hundreds of thousands of lives ‘The Glorious’ or ‘The Bloodless’, ‘Revolution’, named the unprovoked Anglo-French-Muslim invasion of Russia ‘The Crimean War’, the freedom of the fighters of India ‘The Indian Mutiny’, the massacre of Dutch farmers’ families in concentration camps ‘The Boer War’, barbaric Western European Wars ‘World Wars’, and, recently, the imperialist killings in Northern Ireland as ‘The Troubles’. More recently still, it calls the alien, US-installed, American-Georgian-Galician junta in Kiev ‘the Ukrainian government’ and Ukrainian freedom fighters ‘Russian-backed separatists’!

Just now we have the lies of NATO, a paranoid organization which spread paranoia to justify itself and its hundreds of billions of dollars of spending, which should have died when the Soviet Union died. Although it claims to be about the North Atlantic, it has just lost a war in aid of its puppet junta in the foothills of the Himalayas, costing 450 British lives and wasting the British taxpayer £35 billion. Having failed to make Sweden join NATO by inventing fake news that a Russian submarine was patrolling the harbour of its capital, it is now trying to get Western governments to stump up huge sums of cash so that it can threaten Russia with invasion from Eastern Europe.

First they called it ‘lies’, then under the Jesuits and later Dr Goebbels they called it ‘propaganda’. Then in the Soviet Union it became ‘disinformation’ and in the West ‘PR’, more recently ‘spin’ and now ‘fake news’. Such are the euphemisms for LIES.

Dr Goebbels Lives

The first signs that large parts of the Western world had fallen to the idolatry of Public Relations came perhaps in the 1980s with an ex-actor as US President and an ex-actor as CIA-friendly Pope. The gulf between image and reality became fixed. Since then the image-makers (Public Relations) have tried to taken over the political world altogether. In the UK this has resulted in a former PR consultant (and descendant of a slave-trader – though the PR consultants will not tell you that) actually becoming Prime Minister (elected by a ‘clear majority’ – 11 million votes out of an electorate of 46 million – though the PR consultants will not tell you that either).

Thus, the Prime Minister can state that a little minor window-dressing by Brussels means that the people of the UK can now ‘freely’ vote on whether we wish to stay in a ‘reformed’ EU or not. Similarly, when the Prime Minister arms one of his closest allies to the tune of £1.75 billion in just six months so that almost 10,000 Yemenis can die under a rain of British bombs dropped mainly by British aeroplanes, this is quite moral. The fact that in the last twelve months his Saudi Arabian friends have also beheaded more people than IS is also quite moral. The terrorism of others is not moral, but the terrorism of the British State is. (Ask any Catholic Irishman or Boer or Kikuyu or Maori or Aborigine descendant for confirmation – or otherwise).

The Western PR machine has truly been in overdrive in its self-declared Second Cold War against the Russian Federation. Thus, Litvinenko, the spy and traitor (and associated with multiple murders by several commentators), was killed not by his mafia connections, but for some reason by the Russian State (obviously too stupid to assassinate someone more discreetly, like the much more professional British SIS, who assassinate scores every year). The same, apparently, is true of the assassination of the journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who exposed the mafia, and of Boris Nemtsov, himself a mafia agent.

We are also supposed to believe that it was not NATO-trained snipers who assassinated over 80 people in Kiev in February 2014, that it was not Galician Fascists and American mercenaries who slaughtered thousands of Ukrainian civilians in the Donbass and burned dozens to death in the Trade Union House in Odessa. And that Russia did invade the Ukraine 53 times – as announced by the billionaire puppet arms-dealer Waltzman-Poroshenko, even when not a single Russian tank or member of the Russian Army could be found there? And that NATO’s aggression is not the greatest threat to European security?

And apparently the internationally-monitored referendum in the Crimea, in which the citizens democratically and overwhelmingly voted to return to their Russian homeland, was illegal. And apparently, it was not the Kiev puppet regime which crassly shot down a Boeing over Eastern Ukraine. And the fact that FIFA and the World Athletics Federation are corrupt is not the fault of wealthy Western media organizations, betting syndicates and oil-rich Arabs, but of Russians? And if Islamic State is rapidly losing in Syria, it is not because Russian bombardments of their positions have outnumbered Western ones by 100 times? And that the catastrophes in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya and the ensuing invasion of Europe by immigrants is not the fault of Western blundering and meddling?

Perhaps Public Relations should stick to fairy tales. At least children could believe those.