Category Archives: The West

The Defeat of the Kiev Regime and the Rewriting of Human History

Introduction: The End of the Ukraine Fantasy

The oligarch-controlled rulers of the most corrupt country in the world, the ex-Soviet Ukraine, face a threefold crisis: the corruption crisis with its golden toilet scandal, which has made several corrupt ministers under investigation flee abroad amid US threats to release more recordings, amid infighting for power. The rats are leaving the Sinking American Empire, which is now also a Shrinking Empire, as Trump gives up on feckless Western European leaders. But they are only rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic, since the bankrupt Ukraine also faces a financial crisis, with no money to pay the running costs of the country, and a military crisis, with Kiev’s worn-down armed forces collapsing in the East.

Trump is so tired of the defeated Ukraine and the lies of its elite that he has invented a fantasy, draft ‘Peace Plan’, with the bullying ultimatum that it be signed by Kiev. European-backed Kiev at once rejected and radically changed the proposal, for it would mean the capitulation of the ultra-corrupt Kiev regime gang and that of meddling European politicians. As Vance has said, the ‘failed politicians’ (in parentheses, those of the now abandoned Ukraine and of the sidelined huddle of Western European politicians) who live with the ‘fantasy of Ukrainian victory’ have to sign it. This is regardless of the fact that the ‘Plan’ is fantasy and Russia will never sign its absurd conditions, but will win militarily.

The Three Russian Aims

The Western elite has never understood Russia. It feared a sweeping Russian victory in two weeks in early 2022, as the West had experienced in Afghanistan – at first. In fact, in Afghanistan, the US spent over $2 trillion and 20 years in order to replace the Taliban by the Taliban – it was no sweeping victory at all, just the long-term rout of the West. In the same way, if swift military victory had occurred in the Ukraine, Russia would then have faced many years of local popular insurrections, terrorist attacks and civil disobedience. The West was banking on this, a repeat of the anti-Russian war it financed and ran in the Western Ukraine from 1945 until 1958 and even after, revenge for Afghanistan.

Russia’s aims were long-term, to ensure that the regime would engineer its own downfall. To do this, it set itself from the outset three very clear, non-territorial, long-term aims. Firstly, there was the aim of liberating the Russian Ukraine (symbolised initially by the ‘Donbass’), either militarily or else by internationally-observed referendums for self-determination, as it implemented in the five provinces which it is absorbing. Secondly, there was the aim of demilitarising the Ukraine. Thirdly, there was the aim of denazifying the Ukraine. Showing the very patient, Oriental attitude of letting the rotten fruit fall by itself and then taking over with the minimum of losses to itself, Russia has done precisely this.

Since then, the ‘Donbass’ has been extended to mean the whole of Kiev-genocided and menaced Russian ‘Ukraine’, the east and south of the 1922-founded Soviet Ukraine, which had previously always been part of Russia. And the war of attrition, originally aimed at ‘demilitarising’ the Ukraine, became a war of military attrition against the whole of Western Europe because of Western Europe’s self-declared war on Russia. After destroying all Kiev’s arms, all NATO’s arms had to be destroyed, with American, French, British and German armour burning on the steppes. The Russians had to demilitarise the ever-present NATO threat. As a result, NATO’s war stocks have dwindled to very little.

The Broader Consequences of Denazification

In this way the final aim of ‘denazification’ came to mean not only the denazification of the Ukraine, but also of Western Europe, since Western Europe was supporting the Nazi values of the regime in Kiev. The latter still suffered from the Far Western Ukrainian (Galician) Nazis. Russia, like the rest of the Global Majority, never forgot that Nazism is merely one form of the purely ideology of Western supremacy. The only difference was that the Germans genocided the Slavs of Europe (30 million of them died in their genocide of World War II) and the Jews of Europe, and not the brown, black, red and yellow peoples of the Americas, Asia and Australasia, genocided by other Europeans.

Germany has never shown repentance for its Slav holocaust, unlike its repentance for its much smaller Jewish holocaust. The German repentance for its genocide of the Jews is then exceptional, as can be seen by the lack of any repentance by the other Western colonial elites, who are still justifying their genocides of ‘coloured peoples’. Today Russia (with US help) is indirectly going to regime-change Western Europe. From this moment on, the absurd 30,000 anti-Russian sanctions of the EU will be lifted, diplomatic missions, free travel, commercial links and freedom of speech (no more censorship of the Russian media) re-established, and frozen Russian assets in Western Europe returned.

Free of Nazism, the future government of Kiev will establish freedom for all minorities, Romanian, Hungarian, Rusyn, Polish and Russian, with self-determination. This will include freedom for the Russian language, culture and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. The Russian State will be victorious, but the great loser will be the still Sovietised Russian Church. It will have to be deSovietised, that is, decentralised, for it will, true, decades too late, finally have to cede autocephaly to Russian Orthodox outside the Russian Federation. Now nationalist to the core, it has lost credit among Orthodox outside Russia and inside Russia. This is because of politicians, career bureaucrats, and not pastors.

Conclusion: Southern Italy 1022: Columbus 1492: Donbass 2022

The ‘Ascent of Latin Europe’, to use the medieval historian Karl Leyser’s term, that is, the gradual Western domination of the periphery and neighbours of Western Europe by organised violence, including to islands and peninsulas like Orthodox Southern Italy in 1022, Iberia, the British Isles, Ireland, Scandinavia, and to Eastern Europe and the ‘Near East’, began a millennium ago. However, the Global Ascent of Latin Europe began in 1492 with Columbus’ voyage to the ‘West Indies’ and in 1498 with that of Vasco da Gama to the ‘East Indies’. In this way, the ‘Far West’ and the ‘Far East’ fell under Western domination with the dream/nightmare of its total planetary control – called Globalism.

The writing of the history of these events and all that preceded them has been nearly entirely ethnocentric, described almost uniquely by State-funded and State-manipulated Western academics. They always told the story as viewed by the Western elite, not by Western people or Non-Westerners, for those academics had been bought out by that elite. Our Story, unlike Western ‘His-Story’, the actual story of the real World, has yet to be written, despite partial attempts over the last fifty years. This means the rewriting of the history of humanity, not only of Non-Western peoples, but also of Western peoples themselves, a great many of whom have always opposed their tyrannical elites.

The People’s Orthodoxy, Church Freedom and the End of the War

So-called ‘Western Civilisation’ is composed of a fatal mixture of Roman paganism and Germanic barbarism. Thus, Western Europe gradually renounced its heritage from the first millennium, real Christianity, and became subject to pagan and barbarian practices. That mixture began to claim supremacy over the rest of the world, now known as ‘Globalism’. To support this claim, the Western world used its form of Christianity to justify itself, and so justified the devil through its reductionist and secularist forms of ‘Christianity’, ‘the white god’.

This ‘Western Civilisation’ began to collapse after the fall of the Western European empires in the First and Second World Wars. These had in fact both begun as purely European Wars, which Western Europe had spread worldwide, but used the USA to rescue it from its two attempted suicides. As a result of their Wars, the European elites failed to keep their empires. Therefore, ever since the Second War they have used and manipulated the Western European-founded USA to maintain at least the remnants of their power and prestige.

No Western European empire was more manipulative than the most successful Western Empire, the British, which used the English language and culture to gaslight the USA. This is the meaning of NATO, whose purpose was, in the words of its first (British) Secretary General, ‘to keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down’. This was in the interests of the American people or in the interests of the peoples of Europe, but it was in the interests of the Euro-American elites, their high finance and military-industrial complex.

The reductionist and secularist forms of Christianity of the Western world differ from real Christianity, which is the Faith of the Orthodox Church. However, there are those ‘Orthodox representatives’ who also use our real Christianity to imitate that of the West, that is, the blend of pagan Roman paganism and Germanic barbarism. They suffer from a ‘Rome syndrome’, which is why such ‘representatives’ continually send their envoys to ingratiate themselves with the Pope of Rome. There is too much Rome and lust for riches and power.

Wherever there are Empires, real Orthodox Christianity has been abused. Most clearly this was the case with the First Rome in the West, but this has also been clear in the case of its imitators, in the Second Rome, Constantinople, and in the Third Rome, Moscow. Outside those two Imperial centres, Constantinople and Moscow, in the provinces, as in the fourteen other Local Orthodox Churches, we follow the People’s Orthodox Christian Faith, not a tightly-controlled, top-down, clericalist and ritualist, nationalised and centralised, State Religion.

Today, Greek leaders have dared to follow the oligarchic, Capitalist interests of the Americans and their vassals. On the other hand, Russian leaders have dared to continue with the Soviet-style, centralised interests of Russian nationalism. In both cases the interests are at root ideological, and tell those who are not of their nationality to ‘go away’, but other Local Churches welcome those who are told to go away. Chauvinism is not why the Lord granted any people the Orthodox Christian Faith. It was given to welcome people, not to dismiss them.

The following of Imperial, nationalist-political, ideological interests comes from a lack of repentance. And when there is no repentance, then enemies come. Thus, the Greeks had to fight the Persians, the Turks, the French, the British and the Americans. As for the Russians, they had to fight against attacks led by the Mongol-Tartars, the Poles, the Swedes, the French, the British, the Germans and today the Americans. As Russia is huge, each attack was combined, composed of several nationalities, as in the Ukraine, where they face the whole West.

Enemies are like the passions. They only attack us when there is no repentance, that is, no defence. This can be seen most clearly in that tragic situation today in the Ukraine. Both peoples are supposedly Orthodox Christian, but they are not, otherwise they would not be fighting. Every attack and every enemy is in fact a call to repentance. As long as there is no repentance, there can be no peace. This is why wars drag on, when they could end very quickly. Such is the case in the Ukraine, even now with a million killed and many more wounded.

The restoration of Orthodox Christianity throughout the Orthodox Church, and so outside Her in missionary work, will come only when Orthodox Christian leaders return to the People’s Orthodoxy and abandon Imperial, nationalist-political, interests. Those secular interests are wholly responsible for the present schism between Russians and Greeks. We confess the Faith, not some rigid, militaristic, and politically-inspired, centralised religion, designed to intimidate priests and imitate States. We refuse your Caesar and, instead, we follow our Christ.

 

 

Q and A: 7 September-7 October 2025

Contemporary Life

Q: What do you think of the assassination of Charlie Kirk?

A: To tell you the truth, I had never heard of Mr Kirk until he had been assassinated, apparently by Ukrainian terrorists, since he was on their death-list.

Of course, it is appalling that anyone can be assassinated, though it happens every day. Mr Trump has assassinated Iranians with pleasure, and supports the assassinations of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians and tens of thousands of Russians every year.

I think this assassination typifies this intolerance which the whole Western world is now subject to, both in the US and Western Europe. In the US it is cowboy gun violence, here it is ‘cancelling’ people, creating in ex-Catholic Europe a kind of New Inquisition of censorship, just as frightening as that of the Middle Ages, or else, in ex-Protestant Europe, creating witch-hunts of those who tell the truth.

The Western world has become the new Soviet Union, as had been predicted for over 30 years. It hates the Truth. This hatred of the Truth can only be, as Christ says, because ‘the Truth will set you free’. That is why any tyranny hates the Truth.  People say: ‘I don’t agree with you, therefore I can murder you or ‘cancel’ you’.

Some people want to make Mr Kirk into a martyr. You can only be a martyr if you die for Christ. That is not Mr Kirk’s case. As far as I know, he was an Evangelical, with all the deviations that that entails. Read the lives of the saints rather than spend hours youtubing Mr Kirk. There is a big difference. The martyrs showed humility, patience and the joyful readiness to die for their Faith. People should not be bringing politics, either left-wing or right-wing, into the Church. Our belief is the Gospel, the words of Christ.

Q: What is your view of Jordan Peterson? And Paul Kingsnorth?

A: I don’t know much about Jordan Peterson, but as far as I can see he is an excellent psychologist, a thorough observer of human nature and makes many good suggestions and gives good advice to young people. It is a pity that he has not formally become a Christian and so remains an outsider.

Paul Kingsnorth belongs to the Romanian Orthodox Church, like us. Clearly, he is new to the Faith and says many of the things that recent converts say (I can remember thinking and saying the same things fifty years ago). However, because he is a writer and a speaker, he has a gift and can explain his approach to the Faith to those outside the Church. So he is a very good missionary and avoids excesses, like some misguided converts.

Q: What happens to those who get rebaptised?

A: I know one young man, who had never been baptised and then was baptised into the Orthodox Church. Unsatisfied, despite the warning words of the Creed, he then got rebaptised by an ‘Orthodox’ sect. Six months later he got rebaptised by yet another ‘Orthodox’ sect (total worldwide membership – six). Two years on, he now never goes to church. It is clear that his approach to baptism was ‘magical’, and the need to get baptised came from his pathological state, not from any spiritual reason. In fact, the priest who baptised him the first time, warned him that if he got rebaptised, he would lapse from the Church. So it always is.

Q: What do you think of the fact that the new Archbishop of Canterbury is a woman?

A: It is nothing to do with us. We have never been members of that religious group and, like 95% of English people, know little about it. All we can see is that it was founded by the murderous Henry VIII, so he could give himself a divorce, and that today it is an overpaid woke laughing-stock. What I do know and care about is that that there are Orthodox bishops who are not women, but who are either financially corrupt, or else sexual perverts, who form ‘lavender mafias’, or else they are both.

Q: Would you take part in anti-abortion marches?

A: I am of course opposed to abortion, as are all Orthodox Christians. Ten years ago, we had a Russian ROCOR parishioner who wanted to abort a child – she already had two children. Although it took some effort, I persuaded her to keep the child and the Church gave her £2,000 to help her with costs. Today she has a lovely little girl, now ten years old, and her parents are very happy with their decision. This is being anti-abortion practically, and not demonstrating politically in the street.

That only has negative effects, which is why I am opposed to political activism. First of all, it is a waste of time and has no effect. Secondly, it is part of a political ideology (right-wing in this case), encouraged by some clerics who are sexual perverts. Thirdly, it seems to be prevalent among converts from Catholicism and Protestantism. When not naïve, they can at times be immature, self-admiring, self-satisfied, self-important, self-righteous, middle-class, priggish, who want to advertise themselves. Others are sometimes closet homosexuals, misogynists because they are unhappy alone, and can be extremist and hateful. I would not encourage them.

Q: I have heard the statement that ‘the similarity between the bodies of apes and human-beings shows that they have a common ancestor’. What would you reply?

A: The similarity between the human body and the bodies of most animals, two eyes, two ears, one nose, one mouth, four limbs and similar internal organs, proves only that we were all made by the same God.

Church Life

Q: Are there different types of priest?

A: Most definitely. There are three types of priest. The first is the careerist, an ‘apparatchik’, as the Russians call him, they are the yesmen who climb the rungs of the clerical ladder and are desperate for awards. The second type are kindly and moderate, good and popular priests.

Finally, there is the third type, those who are touched by the Holy Spirit and the spirit of prophecy. It is best not to touch them and try and make them fit into some religious system or careerism. You cannot control them. The Holy Spirit does not fit into manmade religious systems. Bishops rise and fall according to how they treat such priests.

Such was the case with St John of Kronstadt, who did not receive any priestly awards for decades and only became rector of his huge church after forty years because of the jealousy of his bureaucrat-metropolitan! Such was the case also with the future St John of Shanghai, who was also persecuted by similar bishops. There are ignorant bishops who persecute and despise the saints. We know who they are.

Q: Which Local Church is going to be at the root of founding the new Autocephalous Church of Western Europe?

A: Between 1985 and 1988, I had briefly thought that Constantinople could perhaps do it, as the Russian Church was still divided and enslaved to the Communist regime. Then, in summer 1988, I clearly saw official Greek nationalism and corruption.

After 2003 and the words of Patriarch Alexei II promising such a new Local Church – and he grew up in Estonia – I thought it would be the Russian Church that could do it. After many doubts and setbacks after 2016 especially, by 2021 I saw that this was definitively not going to happen, as the Russian Church had fallen into Non-Christian centralism with its virulent nationalism and ghetto mentality, clearly refusing to give any other nationality autocephaly.

The Russian Church clearly and openly turned its back on Orthodox England and Orthodox Europe, precisely on 4 February 2022. That was a historic moment. Now it is isolated and is losing the Ukraine, Moldova and the Baltics, as well as the Diaspora, all because of its centralist refusal to grant anyone autocephaly, which is its refusal for nationalist reasons to do missionary work. It is the path it has chosen, to its loss.

Today we have a situation where, with rare exceptions, the Greek Church is only for Greeks, the Russian only for Russians, the Serbian only for Serbs, the tiny numbers of Bulgarians and Georgians are also nationally exclusive, Antioch is only for the tiny numbers of disappointed Anglicans, Protestants and Evangelicals, and the new ROCOR is only for the few pathological convert fanatics. Only the Romanians are left.

I look back with gratitude to the moment when all our parishes were forced to join the Romanian Church by the ROCOR schism (and real schisms are always preceded by heresy, which in their case was the Donatism of the past. You should never return to your first errors, but learn from them). That was a time above all of liberation and relief, not of abandonment and treachery. Our local Archbishop, who is Moldovan, has as his main interest precisely Autocephaly, the theme of his doctorate. This is Providence. In the future, Russians will look back on this moment with horrified regret at their historic error.

Britain

Q: Iranians call the USA ‘the Great Satan’ and England ‘the Little Satan’. What would you say about that?

A: I would make a correction: ‘The Little Satan’ is not England, but Norman England, which is usually called ‘Britain’.

Q: Should Britain have taken part in World War One?

A: Definitely not! Though too late, that huge error was made. I blame Sir Edward Grey for his warmongering and secret promises. If it had not been done, we may not have seen either Hitler or Stalin, let alone all the rest.

Q: Should we pay other countries compensation for the crimes of the British Empire?

A: Who is we? We, the people, never had any idea what was being done abroad by the elites. It is only today when the old, load-bearing, national propaganda myths are collapsing that the people are discovering to their horror what had been done for centuries behind their backs. The asset-stripping both inside the country and abroad were acts of London merchants/businessmen soon after the Reformation. That asset-stripping was reinforced after the merchants took full power through Cromwell and the Dutch and German rulers whom they brought in after Cromwell. The only case for compensation that can be made is for the descendants of those elites to be forced to pay some sort of compensation, provided that they are still benefiting from the criminal acts of their ancestors.

Chisinau, 7 October 2025

 

September 2025: A Tale of Two Cities and of Two Saints

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to heaven, we were all going direct the other way…

Charles Dickens

Two Cities (1859)

Dickens’ The Tale of Two Cities was published 166 years ago and concerned the two cities of London and Paris. Today these cities have become rather irrelevant on the world stage and been replaced by others. These are Ekaterinburg, which in 1918 became the New Paris, the City of Martyrdom, as was old Paris for a time after 1789, and Shanghai, which has become the new centre of commerce, the New London, as was old London until 1918. Ekaterinburg is in North Asia (Eurasia), at the very frontier of Europe and Asia, and Shanghai is in East Asia. In the first days of September 2025, they came to the fore, as three out of the four most important world leaders met because of agreements made in them.

Firstly, there was the meeting of the SCO (Shanghai Co-operation Organisation) and secondly that of the Intercontinental BRICS, founded in Ekaterinburg. The main languages were Mandarin and Russian. And on 3 September over twenty of the most important world leaders gathered in Beijing to celebrate the 80th anniversary of the Chinese victory over the Western puppet of Japan, turned rogue, and against Japanese Fascism. 20 million Chinese were killed in this struggle, 16.5 million of them civilians, for China had to fight for fourteen years from 1931-1945 against 70% of the Japanese Army. This is unlike the USA which fought only from 1941 to 1945 and lost 400,000 from its armed forces.

In its battle against German Fascism, the USSR lost 27 million, 19 million of them civilians. In other words, the USSR and China lost 47 million people against Fascism, whereas US lost fewer than 1% of this. The world leaders gathered in Beijing were national leaders, not tyrannical, oligarch-appointed sexual perverts and puppets of the global banking cartels, as in the West, like Trump, Merz, Starmer and Macron. BRICS is the Concert of Sovereign Nations, which preaches non-interference, co-operation, and refuses to engage in regime-change operations or assassinations of the democratically-elected leaders of other countries. They highlight today’s Tale of Two Cities and Tale of Two Saints.

St Nicholas of Ekaterinburg (1868-1918)

BRICS was founded in the Tsar’s Capital of Saint Petersburg in 2006 and its first summit took place in Ekaterinburg in 2009. Ekaterinburg is the City of the martyrdom of Tsar Nicholas II, his Family and four of his faithful servants in 1918, though the first of them had been martyred in 1916. Tsar Nicholas had reigned over a summit of cultural achievement: Dostoyevsky (1881), Chekhov (1904), Tolstoy (1910); Tchaikovsky (1893), Rimsky-Korsakov (1904), Rakhmaninov (1943); Levitan (1900), Serov (1911), Repin (1930). In 1917 this apex of culture was overthrown in a right-wing plot of aristocrats, generals, politicians and lawyers, orchestrated by British perfidy and hatred of Russia in wartime.

The plotters were themselves soon overthrown by the crude and reactive Western ideology of Marxism, accepted and imposed mainly by Non-Russians. Mass genocide followed. Today, those of us who are faithful to the memory of the righteous Tsar continue his mission. Count and Countess Benckendorff, ambassadors of Holy Rus, travel throughout the East of England and beyond, recently visiting Royal Sandringham and greeting King Charles III, and renewing with St Edmund, the last East Anglian King, who was martyred like Tsar Nicholas by the same heathen. This is despite the apostasy of certain members of the Russian Church, whose liberation from the politicians we all await.

Tsar Nicholas II spoke five languages, Russian, English, French, German and Danish. He was multinational, wanting to build a church for Orthodox in every Western European capital, before the First European War prevented him from implementing this project. Today the Benckendorffs fly the multinational White Russian flag combined with St Edmund’s standard as their confession of the Faith. But a number of Church leaders are still stuck either in the masonic (1721-1917), or the Bolshevik (1917-1991), or the Capitalist (1992-2022) past. Thus, the plagues of nationalism, centralism and sectarianism infect the once great multinational Russian Orthodox Church and sadly enslave it and limit it.

St John of Shanghai (1896-1966)

Ekaterinburg has its saint, but so does Shanghai. Multinational, Imperial and Prophetic like our Tsar, St John (Maximovich) preached repentance for his martyrdom not only to the apostatic Russians in Shanghai, Western Europe and the USA, but also to the whole Western world. As a result of the weaponisation of Western finance, trade, the dollar and diplomacy, the United Nations (UN) may yet move from New York precisely to Shanghai, together perhaps with the IMF (International Monetary Fund), the World Bank and the WTO (World Trade Organisation). Although St John was persecuted, suspended and put on trial by the apostatic Russians in the USA, his victory in Shanghai is coming.

After all, the three largest BRICS nations alone, Russia, China and India, that is, North Asia (Eurasia), East Asia and South Asia, represent over three billion people, some 36% of the world’s population. All Eurasia is now being interconnected, as symbolised by new pipelines which are only reinforcing these interconnections. Even West Asia, the greatest nation of which is Iran, is entering into those interconnections, despite the Western wars against it. Africa, Latin America and even Oceania are also now entering into those interconnections. Missing only is the self-isolated and barbarically aggressive north-western peninsula of Eurasia, that pretentiously calls itself ‘Europe’.

That ‘Europe’ and its US master is now a blend of failed (bankrupt) states and rogue (which murder the heads of other countries) states. As globalists, their leaders hate as ever their own peoples. The 750 + US bases worldwide are not threats to freedom, but monuments to its bankruptcy. The Western world, Northern America, Western Europe, the crusader settler colony of Israel, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and the 47 million of Oceania, is isolated. And so it mounts attacks against BRICS in Pakistan and Bangladesh, Nepal and Indonesia, Syria and Iran, Thailand and Cambodia, Venezuela and Brazil, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Serbia, Romania and Moldova, Hungary and Slovakia.

The Way Ahead (2025)

First the Western world lost its diplomatic, technological and military war against Russia, China and India. Then it lost its economic war of illegal sanctions and tariffs, against Russia in 2023, China in 2024, and India in 2025. Western Europe is still living in the past of its old empires. The Frankish Empire of Western Europe, built against Eastern Europe (from 882 on), against Southern Europe (from 999 to 1194), against Northern Europe (from 1066 on) and then against the coastlands of West Asia and North Africa (from 1096 on), is over. This millennial empire is why it is four times more difficult for Western Europe to give up its hubris and fantasy than for the USA with its mere 250-years of empire.

At this very moment Western European governments are collapsing in violence. Its European Wars, ‘World War One’ (1914-18) saw the suicide, or rather murder by Zionists, of the German Second Empire (Reich), the Russian Imperial, the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman Empires. ‘World War Two’ (1939-45) saw the suicide, or rather murder, of the German Third Empire (Reich), the British, the French and the Japanese Empires. ‘World War Three’ (2022- ) saw the suicide, or rather murder, of the US Empire and that of its vassals in Western Europe, the Ukraine and Israel. At this very moment, Western European governments are collapsing. And the cause is the same – suicide or murder.

‘It would be a far, far better thing that you do, than you have ever done’ for the West to return to the Pre-West. This is the West of the Age of the Saints. For authentic Christianity is not a Western religion, but came out of Asia for the whole world. And so the West would become again part the rest of the world. This is the future, to rejoin the Concert of the Sovereign Nations, in respect and toleration. US intolerance, like its religion, does not export. US religion was cast out of Europe because of its intolerance, its intimidation and bullying are not Christian. Western intolerance, interference in the affairs of others, is dead, which is why the Western world is the museum and the cemetery of its past.

 

 

 

Eight Propaganda Myths about the Conflict in the Ukraine

  1. Putin is a new Hitler and he must not be appeased.

However much Putin is worthy of being liked or being hated, one thing is certain: the facts state that his policies are quite different from Hitler’s and from the appeasement by Western leaders regarding his invasion of the then Czechoslovakia. The ‘Putler’ myth was invented and repeated by politicians and journalists who know nothing either of the facts of Czechoslovak history or of the Ukraine.

Czechoslovakia was not formed out of Germany, it was formed out of Austria-Hungary after 1917. Czechoslovakia had a small German-speaking minority, which lived on excellent terms with the Czechs. However, the Ukraine was formed out of Russia after 1917 and had a Russian-speaking majority, about 53%, whose language, religion and culture were severely persecuted by the anti-democratically Western-installed Kiev Fascist regime. Hitler’s forces mounted a full-scale, unprovoked invasion of Czechoslovakia to take over the whole Czech part of the country, whereas limited Russian forces, numbering only about 100,000, entered Eastern Ukraine to liberate it alone from Kiev genocide (14,000 Eastern Ukrainians murdered since 2014), with NATO-trained Kiev forces of some 800,000 massing on its border to implement ‘the final solution’ and Kiev threats of biological and nuclear warfare against Russia. Russian forces gathered only in order to force peace talks. To mount a full-scale invasion of the Ukraine would take 1-2 million troops.

Hitler wanted ‘Lebensraum’, Putin, as the leader of by far the largest country in the world, does not want that at all, he wants people to live in freedom from Fascism and have their own language, culture and religion. Hitler hated the ‘subhuman’ Czechs, Putin loves the Ukrainian people, which is why hardly any Ukrainian civilians have died in this conflict. He sees Ukrainians as the persecuted brothers of Russians who live by the border (‘U kraja’). The ideology of Hitler was anti-Slav Nazism, just like the Fascist and racist ideology of the Western-created Kiev regime, whereas the ideology of Putin is Russian nationalism. For eight long years Putin tried to negotiate peace with Kiev’s Western puppeteers, but they lied, cheated and refused even to speak with him. This was not the case of Hitler, who did not want to negotiate at all – just like the Fascist regime in Kiev. Virtually the whole world abhorred Hitler, virtually the whole world either supports Russia or else remains neutral in the Russian fight for survival against Western aggression. It is the Nazi-supporting Western world which is isolated, not Russia. NATO, which controlled the Kiev armed forces, was founded by Nazi Germans, whereas the Russian Army evolved from the Nazi-hating Red Army.

  1. Russia is an existential threat to Western Europe

The NATO-armed, -financed, -supplied, -trained and -installed Kiev regime was an existential threat to Russia. It had by far the largest NATO Army, a mass of CIA operations and military biolabs, the ongoing genocide of the Russian-speaking population in the east of the Ukraine and the threat to obtain nuclear arms. All of this went against the Ukrainian Constitution, which was founded on neutrality. As the unelected EU ‘Foreign Minister’ Kallas has openly said, the aim of the Western proxy war in the Ukraine is to destroy and break up Russia, and as a NATO general said, he wants to invade Russian Kaliningrad in one day.

However, Russia is not at all an existential threat to Europe. It wants only a neutral Ukraine and does not want even to occupy the Ukraine, let alone any territory beyond that. It wants to take back the Russian part of the Ukraine and let the rest live its life but as a neutral, demilitarised country, rather as was the Kaiser’s aim in France in 1914.

Russia is not an existential threat to Europe, but it is to the wealthy European ruling class, which flies Ukrainian flags, with its millennial imperialism (‘globalism’) and racist supremacism, aggressive expansionism eastwards, financial corruption, the debauchery of its sexual perverts and cocaine addicts, and pedophile institutions like the BBC and parts of Western religious establishments. This unelected elite of oligarchs opposes diplomacy because it wants to continue the war, rejecting all peace talks because it wants to justify its highly profitable NATO. It justifies its existence by imaginary threats from Russia. It cannot lose face, but Trump can, by branding this ‘Biden’s War’, so blaming it on someone else.

  1. Russia has not been successful in the Ukraine because it has not learned the lessons of the past.

Invasions of Russia by the Collective West have been very common for centuries, even well before that of Napoleon in 1812. The threatened invasion of Russian-populated territory in March 2022, carefully prepared from 2014, and even before, had been anticipated by President Putin. He had clearly learned the lessons of mistakes made by Russia before previous Western invasions.

Firstly, he had learned lessons from the Western invasion of Russia through the Crimea in 1853-1856. Here Russia had been undermined economically by Western sanctions and by its use of old-fashioned rifles. As a result, the British destroyed the (British-built) port of Sevastopol and the war ended in a stalemate, portrayed in the West as a victory. Lesson: Use advanced military technology and be prepared for sanctions.

In 1903-4 the West attacked Russia through a proxy, Japan, which the West had armed and financed, almost bankrupting Japan, with modern battleships. Japan attacked Russia unannounced, just as they later did at Pearl Harbour, and the Russian Fleet was humiliated. Although the Russian land war went relatively well and was on the verge of victory, Russia was betrayed by internal political enemies who created social disorder and Russia had to agree to peace talks. Lesson: Build a strong Navy and ensure there is no reason for internal disorder.

In World War One, by the start of 1917, a rearmed Russia was on the verge of victory over Germany and Austro-Hungary, but it was betrayed by the treason of the Germans, the British (and other pseudo-allies), its own treasonous generals, aristocrats, politicians and the lies of treasonous but uncensored journalists, and lost. Lesson: Do not allow treason, be prepared to arrest foreign spies and aristocratic and other traitors, and use censorship.

In 1941, Hitler and all his Western allies attacked the Soviet Union and was at first immensely victorious on account of Stalin’s inept leadership which had left his armed forces totally unprepared. The situation was turned around when Stalin handed over leadership to the military professionals who had been trained in the Tsar’s armed forces. Lesson: Be prepared for a treacherous attack and let military professionals deal with any aggression.

Russia has been successful precisely because it has learned the lessons of the past Western invasions of Russia.

4. Negotiations bring an end to wars.

Wars are not generally ended by negotiations, they end with victory and defeat on the battlefield, like the First and Second World Wars. The negotiations follow defeats.

  1. Russia is losing because it has scarcely taken any territory since 2022.

By far the biggest country in the world, Russia does not want any extra territory. It wants security guarantees. Its aims were clearly stated on 14 February 2022 and have not changed since then and the main aim was to destroy the Ukrainian military by attrition. This means avoid making frontal attacks and waiting to be attacked by the enemy. Defenders suffer less than attackers.

The dreadful conflict in the Ukraine is then a war of attrition. Wars of attrition, like the First and Second World Wars, continue slowly for several years, with little movement, and then end suddenly. Thus, the First World War ended in five months between July and November 1918 after four years of attrition before that, and the Second World War ended in eleven months between Operation Bagration in June 1944 and D-Day and the Soviet liberation of Auschwitz and Berlin in May 1945, after five years of attrition before that. Russia is no hurry in the Ukraine, on the contrary, the longer it takes, the more the West is weakened.

  1. Russia wants to occupy the whole of the Ukraine.

The Ukraine is an artificial state, formed by three tyrannical Communist dictators, Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev, who brutally stole parts of Russia, Poland, Hungary and Romania to form the present, Soviet-bordered, Ukraine. Russia wants to recreate the historic Ukraine, more exactly ‘Kievan Rus’, within its real borders. The models for any future Ukraine are therefore Federal and democratic Switzerland, its neutrality guaranteed in 1820 and never violated since, or, in the second half of the last century, Finland and Austria.

  1. The Ukraine is a viable state.

The Ukraine has been renowned for thirty-five years as the most corrupt of the former Soviet Republics, ruled by the thirteen oligarchs, mainly non-Ukrainian, and a country deprived of human rights. The Ukraine has for long been bankrupt and now has the highest death-rate and lowest birth-rate in the world. Viable?

  1. Russia is a non-democratic, authoritarian regime.

The Russian President has for 25 years always gained between 60% and 85% of the popular vote. The EU Commissioners are unelected and all the Western leaders, who are now trying to impose censorship, were chosen by oligarchs and elected by between only 20% and 35% of their electorates. Perhaps the real leader of the Free World is President Putin?

Next week Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople is having to visit the USA. Almost certainly he will be told to abandon his gangster church in the Ukraine. It is one of the Russian conditions for peace, to have a Church that the people recognise, and not a nationalist State organisation imposed top-down, which the people ignore.

 

The Big Three: Who Will Collapse First?

At the Yalta Conference in 1945, the USA, USSR and Great Britain were called ‘the Big Three’. In the multipolar world of 2025 ‘the Big Three’ means China, USA and Russia. But there are also ‘the Big Three’ of the Western half of Europe: Germany, UK, France. In Europe many small countries depend on their economies and politics and especially in northern Europe, they depend on Germany. However, today the Big Three are either bankrupt or nearly so.

Even an IMF ‘bailout’ for France and the UK is being proposed and Germany, self-deprived of cheap Russian energy, is on the same path. Others suggest that both governments must issue bonds, to be bought by some still unknown bank, which are essentially war bonds, as the last straw in their indebtedness has been their insane support for the lost Ukraine. In the case of France, bankruptcy could mean the collapse of the whole euro fantasy. This means that the organisations that depend on the Big Three (given the US withdrawal from Europe as a result of its own bankruptcy), the EU and NATO, will also go bankrupt.

At the present time the UK Starmer, the repressive puppet of the financiers of the City of London, is hated and protests against him are universal. I have even recently seen signs in the UK declaring ‘Trump for Prime Minister’. In fact, however, the German Blackrock financier and Chancellor Merz, is equally hated, as is the French Rothschild financier, Macron, also. Macron’s second minority government under Bayrou is likely to fall in a few days’ time. Which government will collapse first? At present, some predictions state that France, the UK and Germany, will fall and in that order.

And we are talking about a fall within the next twelve months. The solution being put forward by some is a war with Russia, the ultimate distraction from the real problems of those countries. This is absurd, given the fact that Russia has shown no intention of aggression against Western Europe (though Western Europe is in a very violent proxy war against Russia). Western publics, unlike the elites, do not want war against Russia and in any case the pathetic militaries of Western Europe would not last even a few weeks against the Russian armed forces. War against Russia is all fantasy.

In such a case, what is the future of the Western half of Europe, the EU27 and the officially non-EU vassals of the EU, like the UK, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, the ‘Western Balkans’ and Moldova? The most likely outcome is a change of elites in favour of realistic and pragmatic leaders, who will make peace with the Eastern half of Europe, Russia, Belarus and the New Ukraine, or whatever the latter will be called.

Thus, the countries of the south-east of Western Europe, those of the former Habsburg and Ottoman Empires, from Austria to Cyprus, from Moldova to Albania, from Romania to Greece, geographically closest to Russia, are likely to become members of BRICS, making their peace with Russia and renewing relations with China through the New Silk Road. Indeed, this rapprochement is already happening, especially with Hungary and Slovakia, although the EU elite is trying to foment regime-change in Moldova, Romania and Serbia as well, as it is losing them too.

Next, the countries of the north-east of Europe, Finland, the three Baltic statelets, Poland and above all Germany and probably Switzerland, will have to make their peace with Russia and the two other East Slav lands, Belarus and the New Ukraine. They will be followed by the Latin south-west (France, Italy, Spain and Portugal) and even the at present Russophobic Germanic north-west (the Scandinavian Four, Great Britain, Ireland and the Benelux Three) will have to make their peace with Russia, though it will need their hated, US-trained and appointed elites to be replaced.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Europe and the Ukraine: Away From Union and Towards Federation?

The Return to Normality through the Renewal of Multipolarity

The post-1945 Western/Globalist Order is over. It is dying at its own hands, by suicide, having voluntarily cut itself off from cheap Russian energy. True, Western Europeans still cling on to their imperial and colonial illusions and the relics of that Order, like NATO and the EU. However, in the USA, on which that Order depended, they have been realising that it is over. Thus, on 1 February 2025 the U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio finally admitted this shift in the global power structure, stating that the unipolar (=US-controlled) moment was an anomaly and that the international community is returning to its multipolar framework. That multipolar world has been ushered in by the BRICS Organisation, founded by Russia in Ekaterinburg on the 90th anniversary of the martyrdom of Tsar Nicholas who foresaw it, but it is ignored by Western Europeans who are stuck in the past. This means that the USA is now again just one of the Great Powers in the world, having been pulled down by its hubris that caused it to overreach and go bankrupt amid a string of political, military and economic defeats. Those defeats have finally helped it realise the new reality.

Bodybags of UK and US Corpses from the Ukraine at Lakenheath

I live under the flight path which runs between the very important US base at RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk, England, and Borispil, the main airport in Kiev. Flights overhead were very frequent in the second half of 2021. In October 2021 I saw why, when I visited Kiev again. I well remember seeing with surprise the massive numbers of NATO armoured vehicles and arms quite openly being unloaded and stored at Borispil in preparation for some new Kiev invasion of the Eastern Ukraine. These huge stores were among the very first to be destroyed by Russian missiles on 24 February 2022. Since then, flights from Lakenheath have varied in numbers according to the needs of NATO campaigning in its proxy war in the Ukraine, where the war is directed from the major US bases in Germany, in Wiesbaden and Rammstein. Last week a large US transport plane flew into Lakenheath from Kiev. According to someone I know well who works at the base, it was full of corpses of US and UK troops. These included those who had died after the Russian raid on Kharkov and their Special Forces raid on Ochakiv near Nikolaev, where three British operatives, officers and MI6, were captured.

Alaska Means Europe is Isolated

The bodybags in Lakenheath came against the background of the carefully-prepared meeting in Anchorage, Alaska last week. Russia only agreed to this, as Trump had promised to meet all the Russian conditions. We were reminded that, given Europe’s political, economic and military hostility to Russia, the latter no longer looks to Europe, but to Asia. As for the USA, given Europe’s political, economic and military irrelevance in today’s world, it too no longer looks to Europe, but towards Asia. We are reminded that even physically the USA and Russia are separated by only three miles, not by the Atlantic Ocean like Europe. Now it is Russia and the US versus old-fashioned Cold War Europe and the authoritarian puppet regime in Kiev. The old Unionist and aggressive Neo-Nazi Europe (the EU and UK elite) is isolated, only the inevitable and perhaps imminent fall of the already highly unpopular elites there can bring Europe back into the mainstream of the world. For the new USA and the new Russia are both set on finding a permanent peace that ends the proxy war, already lost by the West as Trump at least has realised, on the battlefield of the Ukraine.

Europe’s Shameful Decadence: The Fruit of Globalism and Liberalism

The Western European conglomerate (EU/UK/Kiev) is not only morally irresponsible (Globalism) but also morally decadent (Liberalism), like the ancient pagan Roman Empire. The leaders of ‘the Big Four’ (Germany/ UK/France/Kiev) are all said to be cocaine addicts. One of them certainly is, since the son of the former US President was one and supplied it in the Ukraine, where he lived. (He is also said to have done much worse than cocaine, but his laptop ‘disappeared’). Another is a senior agent for the US Blackrock financial company, which illegally owns much of the old Ukraine (and Germany). Another, a Rothschild banker, is said to be married to a man, who in any case is 24 years older than himself and whose relationship began when the future President was aged fourteen. And the final one, a ‘democrat’ who loves censorship and repression, is said to use Ukrainian male prostitutes and is in love with the Ukrainian dictator. The latter has been illegitimate since May 2024 and has banned the Church and all political opposition and opposition media. He was elected only because he promised to make peace, but instead made a disastrous war and ruined his country.

Europe Has No Cards To Play

It was clear that the USA had begged victorious Russia for the meeting in Alaska and that the Russian President only agreed to it because the US had at last understood Russia’s position and that the continuing war is now entirely the fault of the Kiev regime and its warmongering EU/UK backers. All the Western fantasies about a ceasefire, a frozen conflict, NATO ‘security guarantees’ and sanctions against Russia and its partners have disappeared. As the European vassals and warmongers, fawning on Daddy Trump’s ego, waited like schoolchildren in the corridor in the White House, Trump was teaching Zelensky a lesson about reality and giving him an exit strategy. All the talk that Russia is losing the war and has suffered huge losses is now known by the USA to be a mere ‘narrative’. If the bankrupt Europeans want to buy non-existent US arms with their non-existent money, they can still fantasise about that. The end of the war is in sight. There will be a new Ukraine, a much smaller one, with a democratic, federalised government and a free Church, and not ones imposed by the CIA and MI6. Europe’s problem is it wants peace, but refuses to negotiate.

Karma for Europe’s Double Standards

By psychological transfer the elite of Western European, founded on a millennium of genocide, accused Russia of ‘a full-scale, unprovoked’ invasion of the Ukraine. The Russian support for the liberation of eastern and southern Ukrainians from Kiev Fascism was small-scale and fully-provoked. Large-scale and unprovoked invasions, of Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, were, however, carried out, but by the West. The Western elite always uses Orwellspeak, using the opposites to describe others, thus, patriots are called traitors, traitors patriots, authoritarians are called democrats and democrats authoritarians, Fascist Ukrainians are called liberals, even men are called women and women men.  Today the only Soviet Union is the European Union: both were and are run by Western totalitarian ideology. All of this is happening against the background of the demographic crisis, which means, quite literally, that Europe is dying out: the young are mainly immigrants, for Western women have an average of only 0.8 to 1.5 children, the worst case being of course the Ukraine. This suicide is run by the elite, which encourages illegal immigration.

The European Elite Cannot Sell its Failure to its Electorates

The highly unstable and ever-changing European elite of politicians and journalists etc is extremely unpopular with its electorates. The people now vote for new, anti-Establishment parties (AfD, National Rally, Reform etc). None of the elite was elected by even 25% of its electorates, and they have painted themselves into an ever-shrinking corner. Last Saturday only five European leaders out of twenty-seven even signed an anti-Peace statement issued by the unelected EU – the coalition of the unwilling indeed. The senior European elite does not want peace, which is why it tries to prevent peace in Washington. Peace would mean that it has been wrong all along, as it was, and in part responsible for the deaths (or missing) of over 1.72 million Ukrainian soldiers and 120,000 ‘Russian’ (largely eastern Ukrainian) soldiers and civilians. And the elite is also responsible for the self-imposed economic crises in their countries, their crumbling infrastructure and mass poverty. That elite has refused time and again to even talk to Russia about peace. It wants war for its military contractors. Soon it will all be voted out by angry electorates and go into the dustbin of history.

The Evils of Dying Globalism

The Ukrainian battlefield was created by the movement of Unionism, the Globalist movement that reigns supreme in the EU and the UK, and reigned supreme in the USA until the end of last year, when ordinary Americans rejected it in their free election – that which is forbidden in Europe and the Ukraine. Although Trump is himself torn by what to do, he must act – the US faces bankruptcy. Peace could have come in the Ukraine at the outset, but it was forbidden by the EU/UK elite and the dark forces in the USA, who are now more and more excluded from positions of power. The US (Kerry) and Russia had agreed to peace and federalisation even in 2014, but the EU opposed it. Globalism and EU expansion to the Ukraine are the Unionist movements that caused the conflict. Western racism and moral bankruptcy are expressed in the words that the West intends to kill all to the last Ukrainian. The future is the federalised and decentralised BRICS world. This is the future for the New Ukraine, which will soon emerge in its new borders. For now, the EU/UK elite still clings on to past imperial power, failing to catch up with Russia and the USA.

Politicians Inside and Outside the Church Oppose the Catholicity of the Church

This conflict between Unionism and Federalism reflects the constant human rejection of the Divine Model of the Holy Trinity, of Unity in Diversity. That Model has always been rejected throughout history by one human extreme or another, by the forces that centralise and so create national injustices and resentments among minorities, and the forces that divide and so cause warring and sectarian factionalism and xenophobia. In this matter the Russian State is at last far in advance of the administration of the Russian Church. The Russian State founded the multipolar BRICS organisation, whereas the Russian Church has remained, like the Greek Church of Constantinople before it, stuck in its centralising, imperialist, one size fits all, past. In the case of the Russian Church, that centralising past is in Sovietism, in the case of Constantinople that centralising power is the old, and new, Cold War of the CIA, which has controlled it, ever since Patriarch Maximos V was deposed in 1948. All the living forces of the Church await the transfiguring breath of the Holy Spirit, Who will bring back the spirit of Catholicity – unity in diversity and long-awaited decentralisation.

Afterfeast of the Transfiguration 2025

 

 

When Will the Western Cultural Revolution End?

Most have heard of the Russian (Cultural) Revolution, imposed in 1917 by utterly incompetent generals and aristocrats, who overthrew the Tsar as they wanted power for themselves. Within a few months they had opened the doors to the Bolshevik Communist regime, which was mainly led by Non-Russians and indeed Anti-Russians. It was a suicidal act, which led to several million deaths and tried to annihilate the whole of Russian history and culture. It is difficult to say when the hysteria ended. Some would say 1941, when the Nazis invaded the USSR, others say two generations later with the self-destruction of the USSR in 1991. Yet others would say that the end has still not come. This will come only with a new Tsar, who will appear after the death of President Putin and restore what Communism destroyed and what had already been shaken before 1917.

Most have heard of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. It was imposed by Mao Zedong and his Maoist Chinese Communist Party for ten years from 1966 to 1976. Its aim was to destroy anything pre-Communist in China, from Buddhism and Confucianism to Capitalism and Western culture. It was a suicidal act, which killed most cruelly hundreds of thousands (some say more) of Chinese people, of whom Communism had already killed millions in the two decades before the Cultural Revolution was organised by Mao through his personality cult. The economic and cultural results of the Cultural Revolution were disastrous, just as they had been in Russia after 1917, when Russia lost some thirteen years of economic and cultural development, not to speak of the sufferings of Russia and the other peoples of the USSR.

Few have heard of the Western Cultural Revolution, though all know that it is real. Some say that this began with the first part of the European War in 1914, which killed sixteen million people in Europe and intensified with its Second Part in 1939, killing over forty million people in Europe. But its most active phase opened two generations after 1914, in 1964. Since then, the bloodshed of war in the tens of millions has largely ceased, only to be replaced by the bloodshed of abortion in the tens of millions. Reproducing the decadence and debauchery of Ancient Rome before it fell, it has debased not only art, but also human appearance, with an epidemic of obesity, tattoos, coloured hair, metal inserted into the face, ‘gender change’, woke perversion and widespread pedophilia. Where did this ‘Cultural Revolution’ come from? What does it all mean?

Just like the Russian and the Chinese Cultural Revolutions before it, the Western Cultural Revolution is in fact not Cultural, but Anti-Cultural. Indeed, it is suicidal, for it preaches the Culture of Death, in abortion at one end of life and euthanasia at the other end of life, and in lowering life expectancy. And then it wonders why depopulation is rapidly taking place in the Western and Westernised world, as a result of the refusal to have children and cultivate family life. Although this Revolution was started by suicidal Western Europe in 1914, it has in the last fifty years been led by the no less suicidal USA. Ruled by Oligarchy, which it falsely calls ‘Democracy’, it censors all opinions that differ from those that its mercenary Zionist media publish and all the Western countries pay homage to as vassals of their feudal master in the USA.

Do we stop here, with these words of despair? No, we cannot and we must not. Surely, the Western world can ‘walk it all back’? Of course, it can, but it will have to give up the idol of what it falsely calls ‘Western culture’, that is, it will have to give up its culture of ignorance and arrogance, its culture of imagined racial superiority and exploitation of the rest. The proud era of ‘The West is Best’ is long since over. The Western culture that created both Marxism and Nazism, the concentration camp and the World War, gender change and totalitarian liberalism, has been found wanting. It no longer has any spiritual foundation, for it lost that long ago. Only by returning to its spiritual foundations and teachings, which it began to reject already a millennium ago, can it revive. And that will take the miracle of repentance and humility. A miracle indeed.

 

On the Narcissism of the Western Elite

Motivated by hatred and jealousy, narcissists detest it when empaths tell them that empaths do not need them, as we know from experience. This is what has happened between the narcissistic US elite and the rest of the world, which includes tens of millions of ordinary US citizens. Although the US elite began its war against Russia in Kiev in 2014 and has continued it until 2025, Trump has hypocritically pretended to be an intermediary in order to arrange a ‘ceasefire’. In reality, as he does not know what he thinks, he is still just as much controlled by the warlike neocons as was Biden and the Trump of 2017-2020. Nothing has changed. In reality, he has utterly failed to reach any agreement. No amount of bullying, bluster and delusional thinking is going to change reality.

He failed even in exploratory talks about a mere ceasefire with Russia and the Ukraine (originally, he had, amazingly, promised ‘peace’ within 24 hours and then within 100 days). And he also utterly failed to reach a peace agreement with Iran, in which Russia would have been a genuine intermediary, Now the US still supplies Israel which continues its unending wars against Gaza, the Lebanon, the West Bank and Syria. His warships are even hiding from the Yemenis. Trump has also failed with China and the whole world on tariffs. Here he thinks that he holds a gun to their heads – but they hold a cannon in his back. His tariffs are only taxes on poor Americans who pay the US government for cheap imported goods because the USA is so deindustrialised that it can no longer make them.

Nobody in the tightly controlled Western media has mentioned why Trump wants peace in the Ukraine – it is simply because the US elite has lost its war there and is now trying to save face. Trump is simply hiding his defeat. True, the war should have been over within a few weeks, but the West through Johnson forbade peace. This meant that Russia had to fight all NATO, which is why this war is in its fourth year. For in order to fight the whole of NATO, the Russian military first had to be reorganised, renationalised, corruption eliminated and then a huge programme of voluntary recruitment had to be implemented. Thus, the partial privatisation of the Army to the treacherous Wagner organisation, led by the corrupt oligarch Prigozhin, had to be reversed and all reorganised.

Thus, several corrupt generals and officers had to be sacked and put on trial. After such a purge of the corrupt, the whole of NATO, its poor quality arms and its thousands of troops fighting in Kiev uniforms, has been defeated. The Russian Army is today stronger and larger than all the puny NATO armies put together. It has come back from far. In 2014 it was weak, underequipped and led by naïve leaders, who thought that the West was trustworthy and honest. Thus, by its interference in Eastern Europe, the West has thrown Russia into the arms of China. And that Alliance includes Iran, North Korea, India and other countries. It is unshakeable and the more the West threatens and bullies, sanctions and tariffs all those countries, the more unshakeable the Alliance has become.

Now the West is isolated against the rest of the world, the billion against the seven billion. The Western elite is now engaged in wars against the world, not a single one of which it will or can win. Trump has failed every time because, as a narcissist filled with hubris, he hugely overestimated both his own abilities to make deals and also hugely overestimated the prestige and power of the greatly weakened US. His man-child narcissism only reflects that of the US elite. This has now reduced itself to being a Regional Power, isolated against the rest of the world. We see that the world no longer needs the US. Nowadays we can all trade and live without it and without the conflicts it has created with the rest of the world. Disaster looms for Trump the narcissist, as for all narcissists.

The Gospels are full of narcissists. Only there those self-lovers are called pharisees. Full of their own pride and imagined superiority to others and attributing great importance to their external appearance, they loved to sit in the important places and be flattered by others. However, they were whitened sepulchres decomposing and rotting on the inside. Here is the warning to all elites everywhere, not least that in Western Europe, whose worst export to the Far West, the USA, was its delusional belief in its own superiority. In reality, elites are tolerated by history only as long as they serve. Here today, gone tomorrow. For the indispensable and exceptional Nation, just like indispensable and exceptional Western Europe, is now also dispensable and unexceptional.

 

 

Fascism – the Default Ideology of the Western European Ruling Class

What was Charlemagne’s massacre (the EU Fascist elite call Charlemagne ‘the Father of Europe’ and award prizes in his name) of 4,500 Saxons at Verden in the Year 782, if not Fascism? (1)

What was the Feudal system and its castles (1000-1500) imposed by the Collective Western elite on the Western peoples, as it revived two centuries after the death of Charlemagne in 814, their first victims, if not Fascism?

What were the eleventh-century Norman Crusades in Sicily, the Reconquista in Iberia, and the Papally-sponsored invasion of and massacres in England by the Collective North-West of Europe in 1066 and then nine centuries of land theft from the people, called the ‘Enclosures’, if not Fascism?

What were the six centuries of massacres of Jews, Orthodox Christians and Muslims by the Collective West, known as the Crusades (1095-1717), if not Fascism? (2)

What were the massacres by the Collective West’s Northern Crusades (1147-1410), if not Fascism?

What were the Papal con trick of Purgatory, its Inquisitions and tortures, if not Fascism?

What were the Spanish and Portuguese Conquistador massacres of the native civilisations and peoples in what are now called South and Central America and the Caribbean, if not Fascism?

What was the African slave trade, if not Fascism?

What were the massacres of the European Wars of ‘Religion’ from the 16th to the 18th centuries, if not Fascism?

What were the Polish-Lithuanian invasions of Russia and the massacres of its people (1609-1618), if not Fascism? (3)

What was the Swedish invasion of Russia (1708-09), if not Fascism? (4)

What were the ruthless exploitation and exhaustion to death of hundreds of millions of industrial workers throughout the Capitalist world from about 1700 on, if not Fascism?

What were the ‘Highland Clearances’ of 1750 to 1860 in Scotland, when native people had their lives and property stolen, if not Fascism?

What was the French-led invasion by twelve Western peoples of Russia in 1812, if not Fascism?

What were the British genocides and artificial famines in the Indian subcontinent between the eighteenth and twentieth centuries, if not Fascism?

What was the British genocide of the Chinese through opium in the nineteenth century, if not Fascism?

What was the British refusal to help the Irish by giving them food to eat in the Potato Famine and allowing a million of them to die, if not Fascism?

What was the unprovoked Franco-British-Turkish invasion of Russia between 1853 and 1856, called by Archbishop Sibour of Paris a ‘Crusade’, if not Fascism? (5)

What were the massacres of Native Americans and their confinement to concentration camp ‘reserves’, if not Fascism?

What was the genocide which wiped out the native people of Tasmania, if not Fascism?

What were the British massacres of Afghans in three wars against Afghanistan, of Africans in the Sudan and of Zulus in massacres and Boers in concentration camps from 1860 on, if not Fascism?

What were the Dutch massacres of natives in Indonesia, if not Fascism?

What were the Austro-Hungarian persecutions of Slavs, if not Fascism?

What were the massacres (‘pogroms’) of Jews, carried out by Catholic Germans, Austrians, Lithuanians and Galician Ukrainians, some 125 years ago, if not Fascism?

What was the massacre of millions of native Africans in the Congo some 125 years ago by Belgium, if not Fascism?

What was the German massacre of the native peoples of Namibia some 125 years ago, if not Fascism?

What were the British invasion of and massacres in Tibet in 1903-4, if not Fascism?

What were the racist German invasions of Russia in 1914 and in 1941, with the massacre of some 19 million mainly Russian civilians, if not Fascism?

What were the Italian colonial massacres in Ethiopia in the 1930s, if not Fascism?

What were the French colonial massacres in Indo-China and of two million Algeria in the 1950s and 1960s, if not Fascism?

What were the British colonial massacres of native peoples in Malaysia, Cyprus and Kenya in the 1950s and 1960s, if not Fascism?

What were the American massacres of Koreans and two million Vietnamese in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, if not Fascism?

What was the American invasion of Iraq in 2003, called a ‘Crusade’ by the US President, if not Fascism?

The European elites were responsible for the two World Wars, which were in fact European Wars that were made into World Wars. Europeans did this by spreading them and tricking the USA into taking part, flattering it into abandoning its Republic and becoming an Empire. It was the elites of the same three countries, Germany, Britain and France, which were responsible for these European World Wars.

Now they want to create a Third European/World War by expanding the war of the Collective West against Russia in the Ukraine, killing the Ukrainians ‘to the last Ukrainian’, as they openly and shamelessly boast. After all, the Ukrainians are only subhuman Slavs, as the spiritual grandfathers of these Europeans, Charlemagne and Adolf Hitler, declared.

The war of hereditary oligarchic Eurofascist Globalists, clustered around banking elites, against the Nationalists of Washington, Moscow and Beijing is in full swing. The unelected Eurofascist Commissars of the Brussels Politburo are opposed to any restoration of sovereignty to the countries they rule – as we can see with the case of unrealised and reversing Brexit – for that would be to end their power, which exists through enforced dependence on them.

Now the Eurofascists even want to bomb the international Parade celebrating our Victory over Fascism in Moscow on 9 May. What further proof is needed to show that they are Fascists?

References:

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_of_Verden
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Russian_War_(1609%E2%80%931618)

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_invasion_of_Russia
  2. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Dominique_Auguste_Sibour