Tag Archives: Turning-Point

The Ukrainian Crisis: The World Crisis

There has been over the last three weeks a crisis in the Ukraine. The head of the US-installed Kiev Junta, the oligarch arms-dealer Poroshenko/Walzman, has been in Istanbul trying to persuade the local Greek Patriarch Bartholomew to grant autocephaly to one of his schismatic groups which calls itself ‘the Ukrainian Orthodox Church’. Neither of the groups concerned is recognized by anyone in the Orthodox world, least of all by the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Both little groups were created out of ultra-right wing nationalist politics and represent only small minorities of regional groups, which until 1939 were under Polish rule and before that under Austro-Hungarian rule.

This activity comes at a time when Poroshenko is under extreme pressure from his US paymasters to get the situation in his wartorn and bankrupt country under control; elections are coming next year. Washington has sent its Kiev ambassador to Istanbul to lobby the same Greek Patriarch and another US diplomat has been sent to Mt Athos to persuade the abbots of the Greek monasteries there to recognize the Ukrainian schismatics. This comes at a time when the main source of funding for the Patriarchate in Istanbul, the Greek-American Archdiocese, has gone bankrupt, with tens of millions of its dollars ‘disappeared’.

However, in Turkey the bankrupt US-appointed Patriarch Bartholomew knows that if he recognized the Ukrainian regional schismatics (under the pressure of US bribes), it would be the end of the road for him, his authority was already torn to shreds at his Crete meeting in 2016. Claiming to promote Orthodox unity, he in fact has already undermined it. If next he accepted the schismatics in the Ukraine (as he has already done in the Diaspora), he would destroy unity and would himself fall into schism. Then his only alternative would be to become a sub-department of the Vatican, just like his predecessors before 1453.

But the Ukrainian affair is just a drop in the ocean. The real business lies just two countries away from the Ukraine, across Patriarch Bartholomew’s Turkey, in Syria. And that story goes back over a generation.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union from 1989 on through Communist incompetence, corruption and treachery, the neocon Anglo-Zionist elite of the one remaining world Superpower, the USA, wasted no time in destroying Eastern Europe and then dealing with its next ‘enemy’, Islam. So it set itself up in the Middle East and the Islamic world, invading Iraq twice, and set about creating chaos in Afghanistan and North Africa, destroying Kosovo, Libya and then Syria and threatening the nuclear annihilation of Iran. At the behest of its strange bedfellow-allies of Israel and Saudi Arabia/Qatar, it wanted to destroy the power of Islam.

However, in the case of Syria, lying literally just beyond Armageddon, it had not foreseen Russian intervention in support of the local Christians, some still Aramaic-speaking, and the pro-Christian Muslims. In revenge, in 2014 the USA overthrew the democratic government of the Ukraine and tried to set up bases on Russian borders there, having invested five billion dollars to do so and put its snipers on the roof of the US Embassy in Kiev. Its agents then shot down a civilian airliner to try and pin the blame on ‘the evil Putin’.  Its colonial vassal governments in Poland, the Baltics, Romania, Scandinavia, France (1), and above all in the UK, began their campaign against Russia too.

Thu, we read absurd stories of Russian submarines off the coast of Sweden, Russia election meddling in the US and computer hacking everywhere. More recently, there has been the ridiculous false flag affair in Salisbury, presented by UK State mouthpiece media propaganda, which some (admittedly mainly pensioners) actually swallowed (as they did the absurd story of Litvinenko)! The Salisbury affair (its three victims temporarily poisoned by a NATO toxin from the evil chemical weapons base at Porton Down just outside Salisbury, now all abducted by the UK secret services) has been compared to Sarajevo. After all, having lost two wars, in Afghanistan and Iraq, but with 40% and more of world armaments spending (against Russia’s four per cent), the US elite wants to use its arms and the military-industrial complex, and the banks that finance it, need war.

This has brought talk of World War III. Is this really a possibility? Are we really on the verge of Armageddon? The pessimistic (and sensationalist) scenario is indeed World War Three, Salisbury is indeed Sarajevo. True, on the hundredth anniversary of the Anglo-Zionist backed overthrow of Tsar Nicholas II and his martyrdom with his noble family, three generations after the Yalta-Potsdam settlement, we are reaching ‘a tide in the affairs of men’. But the pessimists’ scenario is not the only one. There is a neutral scenario, that despite all the changes and reshapings, the world will continue without much more violence and disruption than now. But thirdly, there is the optimists’ scenario.

This says that the anti-Christian Western world has reached the limits of its decadence and can go no further. The 90% of the world that is not subjugated to being a vassal of transgender Washington (that is, everywhere except the USA, the Anglosphere, most of the EU, the Israel, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Japan, South Korea) rejects ceaseless US wars and meddling. Russia, attacked and surrounded by the aggressive NATO forces, has been allied to China. Moldova and Serbia still have not joined either the EU or NATO, whose headquarters are almost side by side in Brussels. The present US attempt to overthrow the government in Armenia has not so far been successful, like its attempts to seize power in Moscow, Belarus and Kazakhstan.

Moreover, the key NATO country, Turkey, has been so disgusted at the US attempt to assassinate its popular nationalist President Erdogan and replace him with the CIA-puppet Gulen, that it is allying itself with Russia. Together, and with Iran, they are destroying the barbaric Western-backed and armed terrorists in Syria. And Turkey is precisely the country where Patriarch Bartholomew lives. In Russia, President Putin is not getting any younger and has no obvious successor. Why should his successor not be the long-awaited coming Tsar? This would end the mess that the world has been in ever since 1917 and also put an end to the Balkan nationalist decadence in the Church of God, with its pseudo-calendar, pseudo-councils and Ukrainian schismatics who mascarade as Christians.

We can only pray for the optimistic scenario. Otherwise we shall see ourselves slipping even further towards the reign of Antichrist. Important days lie ahead.

 

Note:

  1. Its President, Macron, is a Rothschild protégé just like his friend Trump, who defeated the Rockefeller protégé, Clinton. The ‘Western’ world after all is only an invention of these financial clans, which in their time financed both the Soviet Union and Hitler.

The Western World in Turmoil

With the Washington administration descending into infighting between the new ‘Drain the Swamp’ President and the neocons of the ‘Dark State’, who, regardless of Party tag, have been in control for a generation and do not want to give it up, US powerbrokers seem to be paralysed.

In the US-vassal organization, the EU, the policy of ‘Destroy the Church, the Nation and the Family’ has developed dramatically over the last generation, building on the millennial attack on the Church and the 20th-century attack on the Nation-State by the Western European elite. However, it too is now being challenged by the anti-EU protest of the European peoples, who want either their spiritual freedom (Church Life), or their identity (National Life), or simply their sanity (Family Life) back.

The Western world seems to be reaching a turning-point. Does it continue on the hysterical path towards Antichrist that it took 100 years ago and which it has accelerated on, especially in the last 50 years, or does it stop and perhaps even turn back to its roots and common sense? We of course do not know, but we do know that now is the time for prayer and repentance – or else….

A Victory for Confederation over Unionism

Although against the views of the younger generation, the older generation in Scotland has, unlike most of Ireland over 90 years ago, not chosen full independence, it has chosen home rule. This is in itself is revolutionary. It means that Scotland has rejected the 1707 form of Union, which was successful at the time only because of massive bribery by the British elite. This means that Northern Ireland, Wales and above all England will also receive home rule, whether the politicians grant it willingly or not. Unlike most of Ireland, independence for the peoples of the British Isles is to be gradual and non-violent. It means that the Unionist ‘United’ Kingdom, centralized in London, is no more; the Isles must now seek Confederation.

The Scottish referendum is a defeat for Unionism and the centralized State, as in the Ukraine, where a centralized State, a Leninist-Stalinist conglomerate, so keenly supported by so-called ‘democratic’, self-interested Western politicians, is massacring its own peoples. The results are a clear warning to Unionists in the EU and the USA and a clear warning to elitist Establishments everywhere. Elections to such Establishments are rarely popular and are characterized by very low turnouts. However, when the question put to the electorate actually concerns them, the effect on it is electrifying. Although total freedom for Scotland has not been achieved, the result is a turning-point in UK political life, whose configuration will never be the same again.

Firstly, the Labour Party has suffered massive defections to the Scottish National Party. Having allied itself with the Establishment, the Labour Party will probably never be elected again to government, either in Scotland or in England. Secondly, however, the Conservative Party, almost identical in views to the Labour Party, may also be unelectable – as it was already in 2010. Just as the Labour Party compromised its principles under the Tory Blair, so the Conservative Party has also compromised its principles under the Liberal Cameron. Thus the Labour Party is unelectable in Scotland because of the Scottish National Party, but the Conservative Party is unelectable in England because of the English National Party, although that still calls itself UKIP.

Since the three Westminster Establishment parties have all been reduced to rumps of careerists and opportunists, puppets of Washington and Brussels (Berlin), then the field is now free for new parties to speak up for the undertrodden and disenfranchized peoples of theses Isles. The field is now open to any party, of left or right, which can listen to the people and show a love of freedom and justice – everything that the old parties, captives of banksters, arms merchants, privatized and virtually unregulated monopolies and retail lobbies, have not done. Only through Confederation can the ‘United Kingdom’ survive for another generation, after which its dissolution will probably occur in the next referendum. It is a question of time.